Quite a general question here! What are some of the reasons that a U.K. citizen might be more suited to a B visa over the VWP?
As far as I can tell the requirements of each are relatively similar. The difference being that the B visa allows you stay for 6 months rather than 3.
Is it possible for a tourist to justify applying for a B visa over the VWP? I have heard that it can be a risky thing to do since having a denied visa makes you ineligible for the VWP. Does anyone have any experience of this?
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/immigration/comments/ltmoec/b1b2_vs_visa_waiver_programme_esta/